Skip to content

Examples

Four production patterns for Computed Fields across type coercion, identity, standardization, and categorization. Each uses the transformation type that fits the shape of the derived value.

Context. A finance team's orders container carries an order_total column ingested as a string ("1234.56", "25.00", "1,899.99"). Aggregation quality checks (sum, mean, standard deviation) fail against a string column, and comparing string values sorts them lexicographically.

What happens. A Computed Field named order_total_numeric uses the Cast transformation with order_total as the source field and decimal(10,2) as the target type. The derived field is now a real numeric column, and aggregation checks target it directly.

Field Value
Transformation Type Cast
Source Field order_total
Target Type decimal(10,2)

Why it works. Cast is the specialized path for data-type conversion, so validation catches an invalid target type up front and the runtime is faster than a Custom Expression. Because the derived value is a real numeric field, quality checks like expectedValues, predictedRange, and aggregationComparison all work as expected.

Context. A CRM team ingests customer records with first_name and last_name as separate columns. Reports and quality checks read full_name, but the source system does not maintain that field.

What happens. A Computed Field named full_name with a Custom Expression transformation concatenates the two source fields into a single derived column. The Computed Field appears alongside the container's native fields and is available to quality checks (for example, a completeness check that flags empty full names) and downstream reporting.

concat_ws(' ', first_name, last_name)

Why it works. Custom Expression handles the multi-field combination in a single declaration, and concat_ws skips null components so a missing first name still produces a non-empty result. Because the field is computed on demand, it always reflects the current values of first_name and last_name without needing a downstream ETL step.

Context. A revenue-operations team maintains an accounts table where company names arrive with inconsistent business signifiers: Acme Inc., Acme, LLC, Acme Corp. Deduplication and matching against reference lists depend on a canonical form.

What happens. A Computed Field named company_name_clean uses the Cleaned Entity Name transformation. Term Settings drop the common suffixes (Inc., LLC, Corp, Ltd.) and additional interior tokens as needed. The Computed Field carries the clean value; downstream quality checks (uniqueness on the clean form, existsIn checks against a reference table) target it.

Why it works. Cleaned Entity Name is declarative: reviewers can read the drop lists and understand what is happening without decoding a regular expression. When a new signifier appears in the source data, editing the term list is a one-line change that revalidates the field on the next profile.

Context. A finance team categorizes each customer's monthly revenue into low, mid, and high buckets for segmentation and quality checks. The bucket boundaries change with business seasonality, so hard-coding them in downstream reports has caused drift.

What happens. A Computed Field named revenue_bucket uses a Custom Expression with a CASE statement that reads the container's monthly_revenue field and produces the label. Quality checks confirm the field is never null and that the distribution across buckets matches expectations.

CASE
    WHEN monthly_revenue < 1000 THEN 'low'
    WHEN monthly_revenue < 10000 THEN 'mid'
    ELSE 'high'
END

Why it works. Encoding the segmentation as a Computed Field centralizes the boundary definitions in one place. When boundaries shift, editing the transformation re-registers the definition and the next profile applies the new rules to every row. Reports and quality checks that read revenue_bucket stay in sync automatically.