Equal To Field
Definition
Asserts that a field is equal to another field.
Field Scope
Single: The rule evaluates a single specified field.
Accepted Types
Type | |
---|---|
Date |
|
Timestamp |
|
Integral |
|
Fractional |
General Properties
Name | Supported |
---|---|
Filter Allows the targeting of specific data based on conditions |
|
Coverage Customization Allows adjusting the percentage of records that must meet the rule's conditions |
The filter allows you to define a subset of data upon which the rule will operate.
It requires a valid Spark SQL expression that determines the criteria rows in the DataFrame should meet. This means the expression specifies which rows the DataFrame should include based on those criteria. Since it's applied directly to the Spark DataFrame, traditional SQL constructs like WHERE clauses are not supported.
Examples
Direct Conditions
Simply specify the condition you want to be met.
Combining Conditions
Combine multiple conditions using logical operators like AND
and OR
.
Correct usage
Incorrect usage
Utilizing Functions
Leverage Spark SQL functions to refine and enhance your conditions.
Correct usage
Incorrect usage
Using scan-time variables
To refer to the current dataframe being analyzed, use the reserved dynamic variable {{ _qualytics_self }}
.
Correct usage
Incorrect usage
While subqueries can be useful, their application within filters in our context has limitations. For example, directly referencing other containers or the broader target container in such subqueries is not supported. Attempting to do so will result in an error.
Important Note on {{ _qualytics_self }}
The {{ _qualytics_self }}
keyword refers to the dataframe that's currently under examination. In the context of a full scan, this variable represents the entire target container. However, during incremental scans, it only reflects a subset of the target container, capturing just the incremental data. It's crucial to recognize that in such scenarios, using {{ _qualytics_self }}
may not encompass all entries from the target container.
Specific Properties
Specify the field to compare for equality with the selected field.
Name | Description |
---|---|
Field to compare |
The field name whose values should match those of the selected field. |
Comparators |
Specifies how variations are handled, allowing for slight deviations within a defined margin of error. |
Details
Comparators
The Comparators allow you to set margins of error, accommodating slight variations in data validation. This flexibility is crucial for maintaining data integrity, especially when working with different data types such as numeric values, durations, and strings. Here's an overview of how each type of comparator can be beneficial for you:
String
String comparators facilitate comparisons of textual data by allowing variations in spacing. This capability is essential for ensuring data consistency, particularly where minor text inconsistencies may occur.
Ignore Whitespace
When enabled, this setting allows the comparator to ignore differences in whitespace. This means sequences of whitespace are collapsed into a single space, and any leading or trailing spaces are removed. This can be particularly useful in environments where data entry may vary in formatting but where those differences are not relevant to the data's integrity.
Illustration
In this example, it is being compared Value A
and Value B
according to the defined string comparison to ignore whitespace
as True
.
Value A | Value B | Are equal? | Has whitespace? |
---|---|---|---|
Leonidas |
Leonidas |
True | No |
Beth |
Beth |
True | Yes |
Ana |
Anna |
False |
Yes |
Joe |
Joel |
False |
No |
Duration
Duration comparators support time-based comparisons, allowing for flexibility in how duration differences are managed. This flexibility is crucial for datasets where time measurements are essential but can vary slightly.
Unit
The unit of time you select determines how granular the comparison is:
- Millis: Measures time in milliseconds, ideal for high-precision needs.
- Seconds: Suitable for most general purposes where precision is important but doesn't need to be to the millisecond.
- Days: Best for longer durations.
Value
Value sets the maximum acceptable difference in time to consider two values as equal. It serves to define the margin of error, accommodating small discrepancies that naturally occur over time.
Illustration using Duration Comparator
Unit | Value A | Value B | Difference | Threshold | Are equal? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Millis | 500 ms | 520 ms | 20 ms | 25 ms | True |
Seconds | 30 sec | 31 sec | 1 sec | 2 sec | True |
Days | 5 days | 7 days | 2 days | 1 day | False |
Millis | 1000 ms | 1040 ms | 40 ms | 25 ms | False |
Seconds | 45 sec | 48 sec | 3 sec | 2 sec | False |
Numeric
Numeric comparators enable you to compare numbers with a specified margin, which can be a fixed absolute value or a percentage. This allows for minor numerical differences that are often acceptable in real-world data.
Comparison Type
- Absolute Value: Uses a fixed threshold for determining equality. It's ideal when you need consistent precision across measurements.
- Percentage Value: Uses a percentage of the original value as the threshold for equality comparisons. It's suitable for floating point numbers where precision varies.
Threshold
The threshold is the value you set to define the margin of error:
- When using Absolute Value, the threshold represents the maximum allowable difference between two values for them to be considered equal.
- For Percentage Value, the threshold is the percentage that describes how much a value can deviate from a reference value and still be considered equal.
Illustration using Absolute Value
In this example, it is being compared Value A
and Value B
according to the defined Threshold of 50.
Value A | Value B | Difference | Are equal? |
---|---|---|---|
100 | 150 | 50 | True |
100 | 90 | 10 | True |
100 | 155 | 55 | False |
100 | 49 | 51 | False |
Illustration using Percentage Value
In this example, it is being compared Value A
and Value B
according to the defined Threshold of 10%.
Percentage Change Formula: [ (Value B
- Value A
) / Value A
] * 100
Value A | Value B | Percentage Change | Are equal? |
---|---|---|---|
120 | 132 | 10% | True |
150 | 135 | 10% | True |
200 | 180 | 10% | True |
160 | 150 | 6.25% | True |
180 | 200 | 11.11% | False |
Anomaly Types
Type | Supported |
---|---|
Record Flag inconsistencies at the row level |
|
Shape Flag inconsistencies in the overall patterns and distributions of a field |
Example
Scenario: An e-commerce platform sells digital products. The shipping date (when the digital product link is sent) should always be the same as the delivery date (when the customer acknowledges receiving the product).
Objective: Ensure that the O_SHIPDATE in the ORDERS table matches its delivery date O_DELIVERYDATE.
Sample Data
O_ORDERKEY | O_SHIPDATE | O_DELIVERYDATE |
---|---|---|
1 | 1998-01-04 | 1998-01-04 |
2 | 1998-01-14 | 1998-01-15 |
3 | 1998-01-12 | 1998-01-12 |
{
"description": "Ensure that the O_SHIPDATE in the ORDERS table matches its delivery date O_DELIVERYDATE",
"coverage": 1,
"properties": {"field_name":"O_DELIVERYDATE", "inclusive":false},
"tags": [],
"fields": ["O_SHIPDATE"],
"additional_metadata": {"key 1": "value 1", "key 2": "value 2"},
"rule": "equalToField",
"container_id": {container_id},
"template_id": {template_id},
"filter": "1=1"
}
Anomaly Explanation
In the sample data above, the entry with O_ORDERKEY
2 does not satisfy the rule because its O_SHIPDATE
of 1998-01-14 does not match the O_DELIVERYDATE
of 1998-01-15.
graph TD
A[Start] --> B[Retrieve O_SHIPDATE and O_DELIVERYDATE]
B --> C{Is O_SHIPDATE = O_DELIVERYDATE?}
C -->|Yes| D[Move to Next Record/End]
C -->|No| E[Mark as Anomalous]
E --> D
Potential Violation Messages
Record Anomaly
The O_SHIPDATE
value of 1998-01-14 is not equal to the value of O_DELIVERYDATE which is 1998-01-15.
Shape Anomaly
In O_SHIPDATE
, 33.333% of the filtered fields are not equal.