Entity Resolution
Definition
Asserts that every distinct entity is appropriately represented once and only once
In-Depth Overview
This check performs automated entity name clustering to identify entities with similar names that likely represent
the same entity. It then assigns each cluster a unique entity identifier and asserts that every row with the same
entity identifier shares the same value for the designated distinction field
Field Scope
Single: The rule evaluates a single specified field.
Accepted Types
Type | |
---|---|
String |
General Properties
Name | Supported |
---|---|
Filter Allows the targeting of specific data based on conditions |
|
Coverage Customization Allows adjusting the percentage of records that must meet the rule's conditions |
The filter allows you to define a subset of data upon which the rule will operate.
It requires a valid Spark SQL expression that determines the criteria rows in the DataFrame should meet. This means the expression specifies which rows the DataFrame should include based on those criteria. Since it's applied directly to the Spark DataFrame, traditional SQL constructs like WHERE clauses are not supported.
Examples
Direct Conditions
Simply specify the condition you want to be met.
Combining Conditions
Combine multiple conditions using logical operators like AND
and OR
.
Correct usage
Incorrect usage
Utilizing Functions
Leverage Spark SQL functions to refine and enhance your conditions.
Correct usage
Incorrect usage
Using scan-time variables
To refer to the current dataframe being analyzed, use the reserved dynamic variable {{ _qualytics_self }}
.
Correct usage
Incorrect usage
While subqueries can be useful, their application within filters in our context has limitations. For example, directly referencing other containers or the broader target container in such subqueries is not supported. Attempting to do so will result in an error.
Important Note on {{ _qualytics_self }}
The {{ _qualytics_self }}
keyword refers to the dataframe that's currently under examination. In the context of a full scan, this variable represents the entire target container. However, during incremental scans, it only reflects a subset of the target container, capturing just the incremental data. It's crucial to recognize that in such scenarios, using {{ _qualytics_self }}
may not encompass all entries from the target container.
Specific Properties
Name | Description |
---|---|
Distinction Field |
The field that must hold a distinct value for every distinct entity |
Pair Substrings |
Considers entities a match if one entity is part of the other |
Pair Homophones |
Considers entities a match if they sound alike, even if spelled differently |
Spelling Similarity |
The minimum similarity required for clustering two entity names |
Anomaly Types
Type | Supported |
---|---|
Record Flag inconsistencies at the row level |
|
Shape Flag inconsistencies in the overall patterns and distributions of a field |
Example
Objective: If you have a businesses
table with an id
field and a name
field, this check can be configured to
resolve name
and use id
as the distinction field
. During each scan, similar names will be grouped and assigned the
same entity identifier
and any rows that share the same entity identifier
but have different values for id
will be
identified as anomalies.
Sample Data
BUSINESS_ID | BUSINESS_NAME |
---|---|
1 | ACME Boxing |
2 | Frank's Flowers |
3 | ACME Boxes |
{
"description": "Ensure a `businesses` table with an `BUSINESS_ID` field and a `BUSINESS_NAME` field shares the same `entity identifier`",
"coverage": 1,
"properties": {
"distinct_field_name":"BUSINESS_ID",
"pair_substrings":true,
"pair_homophones":true,
"spelling_similarity_threshold":0.6
},
"tags": [],
"fields": ["BUSINESS_NAME"],
"additional_metadata": {"key 1": "value 1", "key 2": "value 2"},
"rule": "entityResolution",
"container_id": {container_id},
"template_id": {template_id},
"filter": "1=1"
}
Anomaly Explanation
In the sample data above, the entries with BUSINESS_ID
1 and 3 do not satisfy the rule because their BUSINESS_NAME
values will be marked as similar yet they do not share the same BUSINESS_ID
graph TD
A[Start] --> B[Retrieve Original Data]
B --> C{Which entities are similar?}
C --> D[Assign each record an entity identifier]
D --> E[Cluster records by entity identifier]
E --> F{Do records with same<br/>entity identifier share the<br/>same distinction field value?}
F -->|Yes| I[End]
F -->|No| H[Mark as Anomalous]
H --> I